Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Lets make some money-making websites...

I admit, after four years on the net, I have dozens of strike outs, a few base hits, and one double.

My base hits are my vocabulary website which brings in some advertising money and if we stopped spending time on it, would be profitable. My Spelling Website makes no money, costs alot, but is full of potential. My writing tutorial website costs and makes not too much. Probably breakeven. And Time4Learning.com, the homeschooling website, pays the bills.

I won't list all my total failures but suffice to say, I've tried some great educational online ideas that haven't turned out to be great ideas.

There seem to be people out there with sheer hustle and know-how, are making money with only investments of their own time. For instance, I was just reading a blog (somewhat randomly) called: Karlonia

She feels that her list of quotes on money pulls in traffic. I'll quote a few of hers here....Will it make me rich? It did make me laugh....

A bank is a place that will lend you money if you prove that you don’t need it. — Bob Hope

Money isn’t everything but it sure keeps you in touch with your children. — J. Paul Getty

Whoever said money can’t buy happiness simply didn’t know where shop. — Bo Derek

Money is better than poverty, if only for financial reasons. — Woody Allen

My formula for success is rise early, work late and strike oil. — J.P. Getty

Every morning I get up and look through the Forbes list of the richest people in America. If I’m not there, I go to work. — Robert Orben

I’m spending a year dead for tax reasons. — Douglas Adams

I have never been in a situation where having money made it worse. — Clinton Jones

Part of the $10 million I spent on gambling, part on booze and part on women. The rest I spent foolishly. — George Raft



Digg!

del.icio.us

Sunday, July 27, 2008

Stephen Spencer talks...funny...about Google...

I was just watching some of the popular videos on WebProNews and I was struck by how much of the SEO talks are a rehash. Repetitive, redundent, and they say the same thing over again. Many times, in a funny way.

I'm using the word funny since I don't want to trash the guy. Steve Spencer gave a good interview with a few gems in it. For instance, I really liked the point he made that you shouldn't try to buy your way to large numbers of links. Instead, you should use your paid (I personally don't pay so I would say my "controlled" links for those that come from friendly sites) links to focus on certain pages and anchor text. Actually, this isn't exactly what he said but I'm building on his point.

Another real good point he made was how much you should focus on links that appear to be part of actually content, not run-of-site or sidebar links since Google's mission is to rank pages based on editorial citation, not this other type of link.

This is where Steve Spencer talked funny. (OK, I'm nit picking on a guy who was probably jet lagged and running thru the usual conference madness) He talked about how Google is just a company and has no role telling people how to build their pages. "They're not the police or a government agency". He said that in the commercial world, sponsorship happens. He cited a company that gave T shirts to a LittleLeague Team. That team would surely cite their sponsor on their web site, perhaps on every page. And there's no way that google should try to stop it.

Google would respond by agreeing. It's a funny point.

The relevant point is that Google tries to build a search engine based on finding the best results as determined by citations (or links). Google is free to define what types of citations it will weigh in which ways. And they are free to tell those of us that want to get citations that help us with their engine, what should and shouldn't be done. We don't have to like the rules, we can disagree with their direction, we don't have to follow them. In Steve's example of the Little League team, Google should not count the sponsoring company higher because of their contribution to Little League. Or at least, not much higher. Giving T shirts should not be a way to get webpages ranked higher in the search engine.

But, if our goal is for the google search engine to rank our site highly, it would funny to not follow their directions. And funny to complain that google is telling us how to build citations that improve our ranking. If someone doesn't like being told, don't listen. But don't complain about them telling you how to run your business. They're not, they're just telling you how to comply with the citations that they care about.


Digg!

del.icio.us

Friday, July 18, 2008

Languages, SEO, & Resourcefulness

As I've mentioned before, I recently had the insight that many of the people who might be looking to build their English language skills might NOT be searching for help in English. So we've started putting up pages describing our vocabulary site in other languages. We've just added some new languages. Utöka Ditt Engelska Ordförråd - Leer je Engelse Woordenschat -
英語のボキャブラリーを増やそう - เรียนรู้คำศ - 学习英语词汇 - 學習英語詞彙
(for those of you who need help: Swedish, Dutch, Japanese, Thai, Chinese, Taiwanese)

But while having the pages up in these languages is good, it's important to have links up to these sites from sites in the other languages. Here's my magic process.
1. Pick a language. Say spanish.
2. Figure out what they might search for in that language, say: aprendre vocabulario ingles
3. Find an appropriate google. Say google.com.co for Google Columbia.
4. Look at the sites that come up using the google "translate this" tool in the engine.
5. Write up an appropriate post or suggestion to recommend our site. I can do this by either directly quoting my page or using this nifty free tool: http://ets.freetranslation.com/

And that's how I find sites that might list our site. Simplicito, eh?
Digg!

del.icio.us

Thursday, July 17, 2008

Learning English and other second languages

One of our websites, Learning Vocabulary Fun, has a significant international audience of people working (through playing) on their English.

A second point of departure for me is that my Time4Learning audience often asks about how to learn a foreign language.

The obvious online programs for learning foreign languages are Rosetta Stone & Power Glide but they are already marketed heavily. There are other choices. I don't know how good any of them are.

A new possibility is to do a combination of automated software with online tutors working thru one of the new organizations such as: http://www.learnissimo.com or http://www.myngle.com.

It sounds like fun figuring out how to build a comprehensive system, safe and appropriate for homeschool children, to learn foreign languages online. This builds both from Learning Vocabulary Fun and our Homeschool Language Arts program.
Digg!

del.icio.us

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Playing Word Games, Learning Multilingual SEO

Last I posted, it was a Turkish term that was showing up as adding one percent to our vocabulary site thru natural search (via google).

This week, the turkish term is gone but I just learned that the new word to bring in traffic in the top 20: juegos en ingles. I think it's Spanish. It links to our Spanish page: juegos en ingles. On that page, you can read: Los juegos de Vocabulary.co.il ayudan a enriquecer su vocabulario en ingles, así sea para avanzar en el idioma por sus estudios, trabajo, o deseos personales.

Will I find that each week, a different random term in a random language is contributing one percent?


Digg!

del.icio.us

Monday, July 14, 2008

ingilizce kelime - Huh?

Ingilizce Kelime

I am nearing the first month of having on our Learning English Fun website, a description of the site in a dozen different languages.

I just checked the google webmaster tools to see if any terms form foreign languages had hit the top twenty keyword contributors to traffic. The answer is yes, one: ingilizce kelime. If you look at our webmaster tools, it says we are eighth on google for it. If you click on it here, you'll find out where we are today. ingilizce kelime.

I just checked and we appeared to be nineteenth.

The first person to tell me what language that is (if you are in the States), will receive a free mousepad.



Digg!

del.icio.us

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

Non Profit Online Marketing

Since I run a successful online service firm, I'm often consulted by friends, and friends of friends, and friends of friends...well, you get the idea.... about how to help non profits enter and use the online world.

Fortunately, I like to help. So please keep those questions coming. First, I'll quote an article by Victoria Linssen of the Non Profit Times:

Most nonprofits are still communicating at, rather than with, donors. They create Web sites with no ability for donors to add content, comments, or suggestions.

Here's a brief summary of the steps a non-profit should make to take advantage of the new media.

1. Get a website built. Then improve it. Then improve it again. Do not let budget or technical issues get in your way. Today, your web presence is more important than of those printed newsletters or brochures. So budget your time and money accordingly. Hire and rate your team accordingly. Sure, you hire people who are great writers, but do you check on their online skills? Here's the good news. You can find a local agency that will do it gratis. But, think about maintenance issues, how much exposure you are giving them, and discuss the issue with agency up front. This article is too brief to really touch on design and refinement issues but take the point of view that the website is supposed to do something (attract visitors, educate visitors, solicit volunteers, produce new volunteers, produce new members, solicit contributions etc) and measure it's effectiveness at those tasks.

2. Inventory the skills of your board, chief donors, volunteers, docents, and staff. You might find that you have some real expertise in online marketing. Find out who has skills in MySpace or Facebook. Many nonprofits are using these to build communities. Maybe you have people with experience with blogs and forums from their hobbies. Or skills in digital graphics. Build a working group of people interested in building an online presence.

3. Start publishing an online newsletter. Find a vendor or technology to send it out professionally. You can re-use much of the content from your usual print newsletters to start but you'll find, given the economics of a newsletter, that it's cheaper to send them out and people prefer short ones. So many nonprofits switch from a quarterly print newsletter to a monthly or twice monthly email newsletter. Write the newsletter soliciting feedback and comments and always acknowledge each comment that you get (give an email address for easy feedback). By the way, you should use an outside agency to send out your emails once you get a list bigger than a hundred. It is more complicated than you would think to manage such a list well. I hooked up a non profit that I'm involved with (Feeding Broward) with a local email firm that provides the service for free. I use Aweber for my business and others that I see are mailermailer.com

4. Add a blog or forum to your website. Put the newsletter articles on the blog. Invite people to comment. Maybe use the blog as the newsletter (look at how this is done on Vocabulary is Fun) where the blog articles are the newsletter.. You might take our Blog Writing Course to get the blog off to the right start. Or, you can start a forum and have people discuss the issues that your charity is supposed to address. If you are a homeless shelter, why not invite people to discuss the issues on your forum? Heck, why not invite some of your clients to post their stories on the forum? If you are a women's art museum, why not invite every group that visits to give their comments online? At the same time, you could ask them to forward your info to any contacts that they have that might be interested....

5. Get some free online traffic. Google has a great grant program which gives non profits free traffic. You basically pick which search terms you would like your advertisements to appear next to and google gives you a grant to have your advertisement posted for free.

6. Be active online. Daily. Join and maintain your listing in all the non-profit clearinghouses online such as the Charity Navigator, Charity.com, and CharityGuide (to name a few). And network online leaving your name and link as part of it. For instance, if you are a non-profit reading this article, you might leave a comment about how it helped you or what else could be mentioned. You could mention how your 401c3 is using the virtual world. I, and others, might notice your signature and go see what your charity is about. And zoheee, you solicited a new visitor to your site learning about your mission and potentially, getting involved. You can also comment in appropriate forums. Many newspapers and magazines now publish articles online and when they are in area of expertise, comment.

This is a start. This is version 1.1 of this article. I intend to polish and extend it. By the way, there is a great article up on the BlogWritingCourse's blog looking at blogs and non-profits.

Blog Writing Class

I think there are a great number of people ready and interested in blogging as a new hobby, a way to make friends, and a way to explore their interests and skills. To unleash this potential, I have created a blog writing course for beginners. I think it would make a great gift for your mother or father. I'm signing my mom up for it. Also, for people trying to make a little "shoe money" or even work towards a new online career, this provides a great foundation of how to construct a popular blog. Here's some more info that I borrowed from a blog on learning fun....

While anyone can learn to blog, for many it is a lonely frustratingly-long time before you are writing a quality blog and have an audience. Why not take a short cut and ride along with us?You can, of course, learn about the key skills in blogging by reading articles and through trial and error. Or you can take a fun course.

One, Get Ready to Blog, is a free automated course that anyone can sign up for and take at any time. It's for total beginners, a precourse to get students ready for Blogging 101. In the precourse, you'll start with the very basics about how much it costs to start a blog (nothing) and the different approaches to blogging and setting up your first blog. BlogWritingCourse.com also offers Blogging 101, an 8 week online course with a teacher which you take as part of class. The course teaches you the skills you need by having you practice and get feedback. There are some reading assignments but the heart of the course is learning by doing with guidance and support and feedback.

What many students like best is that by starting their blog as part of a group, they have readers, feedback, and comments from the start. And long after the course has finished, they have their initial classmates who have become their first group of online friends that they can learn from and shares experiences with.

The students are a diverse group. From the recent alumnae, there's Topsy Techie who writes about her Unconventional life of a homeschooling family and is well on her way to becoming a famous bloggger. The students range from the Daily Grind of kooky caffeinated JavaMama, the ultra fit Spin Diva, the aging but still eager BlackBeltat50, the trials of Renovation Girl redoing her house and starting a family and of SheParent wrestling with her 11 year old, the life of one BBW (big beautiful woman), and there's the more senior Grey Haired Geek.Come sign up.

The free automated precourse is a total no brainer for anyone thinking they might like to start a blog and want to get a basic orientation. And Blogging 101 sessions fill up quickly so you should move quick. The Blog Writing Course just announced that the summer session starts July 7th and the fall session starts September 8th. Reserve your place now.

The course is part of the offering by Time4Writing - writing tutors - and Time4Learning - Online Learning, PreSchool, Elementary, & Middle School .

Digg!

del.icio.us

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Google Analytics - not really working, yet

For a little over a month, we've been trying to implement google analytics on Time4Learning. So far, I don't really feel that we've learned that much. The good news is that:
- the number of conversions from Google Analytics matches (within a few percentage points) what our shopping cart/credit card system is showing
- we are beginning to get a sense of which of our referring sites (aka ads and partner sites) are contributing not just in terms of traffic but conversions.

It just occurred to me that we don't know if the we are correctly tracking the PPC traffic. We installed tracking codes on our Google, Yahoo, & MSN PPC campaigns so we can track that traffic separately. I wonder if the the PPC results from within those programs matches the Webanalytics results?

The big problem is that 70% of our conversions are being tracked by Google Analytics as "direct", meaning they found our site through typing in our URL or through a bookmark. I simply don't believe that since our users report, as part of the signup process, how they heard about us and we get around 70% reporting that they found us through the search engines.

I also noticed that we got NO conversions out of our top 16 keyphrases from natural search.
This feels unlikely to be true.

When we dug into the statistics, I was told because of the iframe coding on our demos, the sessions could not be tracked. (which is why the iframe demos were recoded with java script).
This would explain why two thirds of our conversions are classed as "direct entry".

But, this doesn't make sense. Google analytics, much like PPC, is primarily cookie-based. This means that whether the session was trackable or not, google analytics ought to be able to track the conversions back to the original entry to the site. So even if a user found us through natural search, bookmarked us, return a week later and signed up, Google analytics should report them as natural search.


Digg!

del.icio.us

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

Multilingual SEO - How does it work?

I have a site that helps people to learn English. It has a variety of English vocabulary word games. The site is well positioned in the search engines. It is number two on google for the word vocabulary and most of it's traffic is from people who have bookmarked the site and keep returning to it.

It recently occurred to me that many of the potential users of the site might not be searching for such a site in English. So I have invested in getting some pages created describing the site in different languages. I've put them up on the site and am now wondering if the different versions of google (spanish, french, turkish etc) will find and rank these pages.

It would help if someone built links to the pages in their native languages but I fear that might be a little beyond me. Here's the pages that are up so far....

Build Vocabulary

Construcción de Vocabulario

İngilizce Kelime Dağarcığını Öğrenin

Изучайте Английские Слова

Вивчайте англійські слова

Научи думички на английски език

Apprendre le vocabulaire Anglais

Naucz się Angielskich Słówek

Lernen SieEnglisch-Vokabular

Impara il lessico inglese

Lær Engelsk ordforråd

And coming soon, the oriental languages (Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese), Hindi and some other languages from the Indian subcontinent, and Russian. Any views on whether these efforts will be cost effective? We're spending about $25 per page to get them translated plus inhouse costs for managing the project and get the pages up.



Digg!

del.icio.us

Friday, June 06, 2008

Old links vs archived links vs new links

When blog software "archives" old articles, do the links lose some sort of importance for google? If so, this might be the achilles heel of using blogs as a way to create links. Mostly, us SEO types, really like blogs. They seem to build their own incoming links everytime they post. It's something to do with how they "ping" all those directories which index and refer (think links) to them.

But, once archived, do those links become less visible to google? Less important?

Think of it this way, new links are important. If lots of sites link to a site, it's likely that there is something of importance on that site. If those links are still around after a few months, the site is still important but somehow, if there aren't new links, google must also think about the significance of that.

But what if all the links start showing up only in "archives"? What does google think about links from archives? Do they rate them differently than other links that have been in place for a long time?

Any real visionaries got an opinion they'd like to share?

PS - Anybody who is watching me closely might notice that I'm posting this the same day that I'm deep in Yosemite park. It's thru the magic of blogger's new post options which include future dates. Like Hermonie's time trick.

Digg!

del.icio.us

Tuesday, June 03, 2008

Blog posts, corrections, RSS & Feedburner - How does it work?

I sometimes (often) make mistakes in my blog posts. After I publish them, I notice the errors and I open up the post and fix them. I've often wondered whether after hitting the publish button, will my corrections show up on every instance of my post or not?

For instance, I use feedburner to publish my posts. I've learned that feedburner sends out the posts at the end of the day (maybe Califorinia time). So as long as I make corrections during the day, the errors don't show up in the versions that get emailed out.

But, my posts also get published thru feedburner to countless readers thru RSS. And this blog is also hooked up to blogcatalog.. I just looked at my posts insider blogcatalog and my post from about 15 minutes ago is not yet there. But, once it appears there, if I make a change in the original, will it get fixed there?

I will now run an experiment. I am going to go back to my post of Tuesday May 27th, 2008 and I'll change the ending:
from: Dear reader, what would you do?
to: Dear readers, what would you do? I'm willing to pay for a real answer to this question. Contact me for details.

And I'll see whether the version in blogcatalog changes. Also whether the version in my google reader changes

Digg!

del.icio.us

Saturday, May 31, 2008

Quality Reading

I fall into bad habbits, even in terms of what I read. People is a waste of my time. It's like junk food. I sometimes read it and almost always wish I hadn't.

I'm trying to improve my online reading habbits by moving towards having a list of very high quality sources that I read. Two are about technology, one picks great education sites. I'll probably update this to a list of ten.

1. Matt Cutts Blog
2. The official Google blog. Recent post: Intro to Google Search Quality.
3 http://larryferlazzo.edublogs.org/ - even though he only occassionally picks my sites (SpellingCity or Vocabulary Fun or Learning Games for Kids.)


Digg!

del.icio.us

Friday, May 30, 2008

John Chow

John Chow.

Thank you John Chow and DatMoney. I thought I would try your trick of riding on John Chow's coat-tails. As you suggested, I have never been to Mr. John Chow's blog but I do hope that this post, about John Chow's blog, will grant me large volumes of interested blog readers. Hopefully, not too disappointed to not be at John Chows blog but instead, to be at the best intermediate level online marketing blog about learning seo on the web.

Well, maybe not the best. One of the best. Thanks again Dat Money for you j chow, i mean john chow test idea.
--------------
Postscript - John Chow turns out to be a real person, or this is a more complete charade than I had imagined. His blog got banned from google. I'm still looking at how to learn to promote my sites better. I'm hoping that the class in blogging will help.

Digg!

del.icio.us