I continue to be confused and intrigued by the mysteries of the Youtube search algorithm. How does it decide what to give. Here's some data, lets analse it. I'm going to a blank browser that I'm not logged into. "home school."
Top Video in youtube search for "home school": What's the Youtube search algorithm doing?
Here's a summary of the top items, can anyone see a pattern? The full results is down below.
8M views, 1 year ago: 701K / month (approx)
55K views, 7 months ago 7.9K / month
806K views, 6 months ago 134K / month
99K views, 1 year ago 8.2K / month
102K views, 1 year ago, 8.5K / month
26K views, 2 days ago, est at 396K /month (moving up as this number solidifies)
31K views, 10 months ago, 3K / month
77K views, 7 months ago, 11K / month
527K views, 6 months, 88K / month
Theories...
Who is in the game for relevance? For this, I would have to search the tags, script, title, and so on related to each of the top 20 or so videos.
How do they get to the top of the Youtube search engine?
There's a certain thresh-hold of views per month or day to make the top?
I could do the math on each of these doing a per month view. Does it all have to do with momentum?
The top is determined not by overall history but recent trends?
Is there a random factor? How much does it shift at a given moment, over a week, two, a month?
Does relevance relate to position as part of popularity?
1 My Home School Routine!
2 13 year old Logan quits school and starts home schooling education system - TED
Blorum.info: A blog+forum for discussions, often with myself, about how the digital media industry functions. Since you've wandered in, feel free to share some thoughts as comments on the blog. You might find a few insights. Please share a few too.
Showing posts with label optimize for search engine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label optimize for search engine. Show all posts
Friday, September 05, 2014
Monday, June 21, 2010
Link Mechanics
Here's a quick summary of the link quality portion of an internal seminar that we had on SEO.
1. If I put two links from one page to another page, does the second link help at all? NO. NOT AT ALL! The second anchor text and link are totally ignored.
2. Are links from images or links from text more valuable from a SEO perspective? Text links are preferable.
3. Are text links within the body content more valuable then links elsewhere on the page? Links from within the body of a paragraph are considered more likely to be organic references and hence, count more.
4. How many links per paragraph is considered too many? A very rough rule of thumb is that one link per hundred words is optimal.
5. Is a sidebar link superior to a content link? This is really a repeat of question 3 above. In content links are considered the best.
6. Is it better to use a shotgun or a rifle? Of course, what I mean, is it better to target a page by using the exact same anchor text over and over again or to vary it slightly? Slight variations are more natural. So if you are targetting "delicious hot dogs", you might try variations such as "hot dogs","hot delicious dogs","tasty hot dogs","delicious dogs","delicious sausages","yummy frankfurthers". The idea is for it to be natural, not highly organized. I'm betting that Google will start figuring out synonyms soon (ie latent semantics in the jargon of search).
7. Are run of site links valuable? It's hard to tell, they certainly aren't very valuable. On one hand, Google might consider them to be bought and worthless like so many footers. Or, like so many blogs, they might be considered truly natural endorsements.
8. How important is the relevance of one site to another, of one page to another, in terms of the value of the link. VERY Valuable. If you are on a site called homeschool freaks and you link to another page using homeschool freaks as the anchor text and that page is titled homeschool freaks,Google takes that endorsement very seriously.
9. How much more important is a good site from a great site, a PR of 6 over a PR of 3? This is a great mystery but I would guess that each PR (all else being equal) is one order of magnitude more important than the previous level. So, ten links from sites with NO page rank equal the value of a PR of 1. A link from a PR of 5 is ten times more valuable than a link from a PR of 4. Note that I say; "all else being equal" which means relevance, number of outgoing links etc. Also note that I have not seen anybody else even attempt to quantify this which means that they are all wimps.
10. Does a site's organization matter in terms of link quality? Yes, Google likes content sites organized into content areas that it understands. This is a confusing and ambiguous area. Is Google looking at internal link structure or to folders? One one hand, I hear that they discount pages that are far from the root directory by every folder so I try to keep everything close to the root. On the other hand, this simplistic rule makes no sense to me so I don't want to take it too seriously.
11. How can you tell how credible a site is to Google? Easy, search a bunch of relevant terms and see how high in the search engines it is?
12. Is there a simpler way to see how credible a site is? Maybe, try using a link counter and then evaluate the quality and relevance of the links. Also, check out how old it is. And see if the links come from .govs or .edus which probably count more. There are tools for this.
13. Do title tags on text links and alt tags on image links help? What about adding a title tag on an image link? All the tags help, the title tag on the image is a little extreme but maybe worthwhile.
14. What's the best links to focus on? This is really a rehash of much of the above especially the rifle vs shotgun and run of site vs natural questions. The best thing is to have a natural looking mix of links which grow steadily. Growing by 10% in a day or a week is, for established sites, an upward limit. More is weird an merits being looked at. Just keep tryign to get more links of many different types on an ongoing basis focusing on mixing it up and mixing it up. This is the natural pattern of the messy world and shows that the links are natural. LOL!
Tools
majesticseo
yahoo website explorer
Google's wonder wheel
seomoz.org
raven-seo-tools.com
Terms
Trust
edgerank
title tag
alt tag
halo link
1. If I put two links from one page to another page, does the second link help at all? NO. NOT AT ALL! The second anchor text and link are totally ignored.
2. Are links from images or links from text more valuable from a SEO perspective? Text links are preferable.
3. Are text links within the body content more valuable then links elsewhere on the page? Links from within the body of a paragraph are considered more likely to be organic references and hence, count more.
4. How many links per paragraph is considered too many? A very rough rule of thumb is that one link per hundred words is optimal.
5. Is a sidebar link superior to a content link? This is really a repeat of question 3 above. In content links are considered the best.
6. Is it better to use a shotgun or a rifle? Of course, what I mean, is it better to target a page by using the exact same anchor text over and over again or to vary it slightly? Slight variations are more natural. So if you are targetting "delicious hot dogs", you might try variations such as "hot dogs","hot delicious dogs","tasty hot dogs","delicious dogs","delicious sausages","yummy frankfurthers". The idea is for it to be natural, not highly organized. I'm betting that Google will start figuring out synonyms soon (ie latent semantics in the jargon of search).
7. Are run of site links valuable? It's hard to tell, they certainly aren't very valuable. On one hand, Google might consider them to be bought and worthless like so many footers. Or, like so many blogs, they might be considered truly natural endorsements.
8. How important is the relevance of one site to another, of one page to another, in terms of the value of the link. VERY Valuable. If you are on a site called homeschool freaks and you link to another page using homeschool freaks as the anchor text and that page is titled homeschool freaks,Google takes that endorsement very seriously.
9. How much more important is a good site from a great site, a PR of 6 over a PR of 3? This is a great mystery but I would guess that each PR (all else being equal) is one order of magnitude more important than the previous level. So, ten links from sites with NO page rank equal the value of a PR of 1. A link from a PR of 5 is ten times more valuable than a link from a PR of 4. Note that I say; "all else being equal" which means relevance, number of outgoing links etc. Also note that I have not seen anybody else even attempt to quantify this which means that they are all wimps.
10. Does a site's organization matter in terms of link quality? Yes, Google likes content sites organized into content areas that it understands. This is a confusing and ambiguous area. Is Google looking at internal link structure or to folders? One one hand, I hear that they discount pages that are far from the root directory by every folder so I try to keep everything close to the root. On the other hand, this simplistic rule makes no sense to me so I don't want to take it too seriously.
11. How can you tell how credible a site is to Google? Easy, search a bunch of relevant terms and see how high in the search engines it is?
12. Is there a simpler way to see how credible a site is? Maybe, try using a link counter and then evaluate the quality and relevance of the links. Also, check out how old it is. And see if the links come from .govs or .edus which probably count more. There are tools for this.
13. Do title tags on text links and alt tags on image links help? What about adding a title tag on an image link? All the tags help, the title tag on the image is a little extreme but maybe worthwhile.
14. What's the best links to focus on? This is really a rehash of much of the above especially the rifle vs shotgun and run of site vs natural questions. The best thing is to have a natural looking mix of links which grow steadily. Growing by 10% in a day or a week is, for established sites, an upward limit. More is weird an merits being looked at. Just keep tryign to get more links of many different types on an ongoing basis focusing on mixing it up and mixing it up. This is the natural pattern of the messy world and shows that the links are natural. LOL!
Tools
majesticseo
yahoo website explorer
Google's wonder wheel
seomoz.org
raven-seo-tools.com
Terms
Trust
edgerank
title tag
alt tag
halo link
Tuesday, April 01, 2008
Free SEO tools
These free tools are tremendous. I've not yet paid for an SEO tool.
Web Site Grader - It says that I'm doing a great job. 93%.
Quantcast - It gives you amazing stats on your site.
Yahoo's site explorer - Gives info on links.
Google's Keyword rating tool - The adwords tools made available for everyone.
This article somewhat obsoletes the previous one on SEO Free Tools.


del.icio.us
Web Site Grader - It says that I'm doing a great job. 93%.
Quantcast - It gives you amazing stats on your site.
Yahoo's site explorer - Gives info on links.
Google's Keyword rating tool - The adwords tools made available for everyone.
This article somewhat obsoletes the previous one on SEO Free Tools.
Friday, February 01, 2008
Learning to Optmize Search Engine Terms - Using Power Words
When learning to optimize our Vocabulary Games site for search engines we have found that some terms are much more powerful than others. "Power Words" for instance seems to be an important term which isn't immediately obvious when delving into the world of Vocabulary, but makes sense once you know about it!
We've found that we're not gaining any traffic on terms like Vocabulary Software, although it is a powerful concept in Googleland. Is it important to know what we aren't as much as it is to know what we are? We don't rank on the term "fruit baskets" either. What does this tell us? Hmmmm
We've found that we're not gaining any traffic on terms like Vocabulary Software, although it is a powerful concept in Googleland. Is it important to know what we aren't as much as it is to know what we are? We don't rank on the term "fruit baskets" either. What does this tell us? Hmmmm
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)